Cases 51 - 60 of 2,505
Savage v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Marquice D Savage
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Adams, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al.
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Tiger Commissary Services
as 4:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Tiger Commissary Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 4:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority, DO Hirsh, Amy Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wink et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Tamar Jackson
Defendant:
Eugene Wink and Max Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrow v. USA
as 4:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Earl Hardy Morrow
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lemmons v. Melody et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant:
Nurse Melody, Gentner Drummond, Administrative Head of State Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2023cv00516
Petitioner:
Keith Dewane Hopper
Respondent:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
