Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Laureate Institute, Tulsa County, Ryan Braschler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chester v. Pratt et al
as 4:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Toni-Lynn Chester
Defendant:
James Pratt, O Robert Burris, III, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz et al v. Johnson Matthey Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Cruz , Scott Bender , Konark Ogra and others
Defendant:
Johnson Matthey Inc. , University of Tulsa, The , Chevron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brashear v. Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 4:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
John Allen Brashear
Defendant:
Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners , Stanley Glanz , William Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wavylee v. North American Galvanizing Co-Catoosa
as 4:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
Wavylee Pierce
Defendant:
North American Galvanizing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Passons v. Osage Nation Government et al
as 4:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Russell Allen Passons
Defendant:
Osage Nation Government, Department of the Interior, Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2014cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jay Wayne Bates
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Don Pierce and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
