Cases 11 - 20 of 35
JINES et al v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2021cv00346
Defendant:
THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION doing business as DEVEREUX ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and QUALITYHEALTH STAFFING, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUTERA v. PRIME CARE et al
as 2:2020cv04691
Defendant:
NURSE JANE DOE - 10, NURSE JANE DOE - 1, NURSE JANE DOE - 4 and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BUTERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMANOWSKI v. JONES et al
as 2:2020cv01911
Defendant:
JANE DOES 3-50, MARY JONES, JOHN DOES 3-50 and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. ROMANOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2019cv03816
Defendant:
HANUSCHAK, JANE DOE 1, HANS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. GANTMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02581
Defendant:
MARY P. MURRAY, ALICE BECK DUBOW, JANE DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. CASTLEBERRY et al
as 2:2019cv02659
Defendant:
EVERETT GILLISON, THEODORE JOHNSON, AUDREY DONALD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
KENNEDY v. GETTYSBURG COLLEGE et al
as 2:2018cv04488
Defendant:
PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY, GETTYSBURG COLLEGE, PHI SIGMA KAPPA DRUID ALUMNI ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
KELSI KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
HOUSE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv04283
Defendant:
DEVON SMITH, JANE DOE #1, SHARON HILL FAMILY DOLLAR, CORPORATION, ESTABLISHMENT(S) and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01128
Plaintiff:
EXAVIER WARDLAW
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE PHILADELPHIA WATER REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
