Cases 11 - 20 of 49
PETERSON v. WARDEN DAVID BYRNE et al
as 2:2020cv00091
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID BYRNE, NURSING DIRECTOR MARIEL TRIMBLE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RASHEED and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2020cv00356
Defendant:
C/O S. BALDWIN, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SGT. ROYALS and others
Plaintiff:
RASHEED VAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00527
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PALM et al v. BELL et al
as 2:2018cv04173
Defendant:
DAVID REED, BYRON HAYES, BUNDY TYPE WRITER & COMPUTER/GEEK SQUAD and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER NERDS INC. and JOHN EDWARD PALM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAWRENCE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv04144
Petitioner:
RASHEED LAWRENCE
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL et al v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv06405
Plaintiff:
TAWANNA HALL and RASHEED HALL CRAWLEY, II
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03240
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RASHEED SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHILLIPS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
RASHEED PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL E. SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DPJ v. DELAWARE VALLEY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 2:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
DPJ
Defendant:
DELAWARE VALLEY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL , JOHN HARGROVES , DANTE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATERS v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
RASHEED WATERS
Defendant:
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP and JOHN BARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
