Cases 11 - 20 of 28
CASCAMO v. ARIZA et al
as 2:2021cv02901
Defendant:
JANE DOE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CASCAMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
TURNER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE et al
as 5:2021cv01953
Plaintiff:
ALRENA TURNER
Defendant:
USPS, ANTHONY EVE and UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVE v. PATEL et al
as 2:2020cv05548
Plaintiff:
ADVHOOT DAVE and AVDHOOT DAVE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS) and SHIRIN H PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
GLOVER v. BRENNAN et al
as 2:2020cv01913
Defendant:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN and USPS
Plaintiff:
JAMES L GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEGRAND et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv01783
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HAZELTON USP PRIVATE OWN
Plaintiff:
MARTELL A. LEGRAND
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MOORE v. WARDEN - USP ALLENWOOD
as 2:2020cv01334
Respondent:
WARDEN - USP ALLENWOOD
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLERBE v. THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2017cv01473
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA, ROBERT A. BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TAYLOR v. USP ALLENWOOD PA, ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
GREGORY S. TAYLOR, J
Defendant:
USP ALLENWOOD PA, ADMINISTRATION and CENTRAL OFFICE OF WASHINGTON, DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
