Cases 21 - 30 of 389
RIZVI, et al v. GIBSON, et al
as 5:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
SYED O. RIZVI and MONA RIZVI
Defendant:
RAINY GIBSON, MAURICE GIBSON and CYNTHIA GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. KELLY et al
as 2:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
LIAM KELLY, MAURICE COLLINS and SNUGBAR LLC doing business as CON MURPHY'S IRISH PUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEWSUAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv04183
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
C/O TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWSUAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv04126
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03934
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CHILDS v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv03320
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHILDS
Respondent:
CHERYL STEBERGER, DORINDA HOWARD, HOWARD KNISELY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHOATZ v. FARRELL
as 2:2022cv02165
Petitioner:
MAURICE SHOATZ
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHELLE FARRELL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Goines v. F21 OPCO LLC
as 2:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
Maurice Goines
Defendant:
F21 OPCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
