Cases 31 - 40 of 110
LYTER v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 5:2019cv00664
Defendant:
JOHN M. SOLECKI, FRANK PAWLOSKI, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LYTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROOMS HAULING, LLC et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv05405
Defendant:
CORPORAL LOUIS ROBINSON, WILLIAM MCCARDLE, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY GROOMS, GROOMS HAULING, LLC and CYNTHIA PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. GETZ, et al
as 5:2018cv03532
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA COURTS, MALACHY EDWARD MANNION, PHILIP CARL PETRUS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPANN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2018cv02050
Plaintiff:
LEROY SPANN
Defendant:
BRIAN DONOVAN and THE MEGAN LAW SECTION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LYONS et al v. NOSAL et al
as 2:2018cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYONS, JR. and LYNNE M. LYONS
Defendant:
DAVID J. NOSAL, BRENDAN SHEARN, SHAUN MAHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIRARCHI et al v THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2018cv00286
Plaintiff:
DOMINICO MIRARCHI and EMELIA MIRARCHI
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MICHAEL PERILLO and BRUCE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CURRENT v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2017cv05385
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, RONALD B. TURK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CURRENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CATERBONE v. TRUMP et al
as 5:2017cv04000
Petitioner:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Respondent:
DONALD TRUMP, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
