Cases 61 - 70 of 324,156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FORRESTER
as 2:2024cv02465
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILFRED FORRESTER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
RICE v. KARASTON et al
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
C/O KARASTON, C/O MANTUCE, C/O ANTWON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
N.B. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
N.B.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, VALERIE ARKOOSH and Phoenix House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
VAN v. RICARD
as 2:2024cv02485
Petitioner:
ANDRE VAN
Respondent:
WARDEN RICARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MCCRAY v. MARSTON
as 2:2024cv02339
Plaintiff:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and DONALD MCCRAY
Defendant:
KAREN S. MARSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SIPPLE et al
as 2:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
DEP. MANDY SIPPLE, UM. FANRAK, LT. CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. OLDHAM GLOBAL, LLC
as 2:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R RILEY
Defendant:
OLDHAM GLOBAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Lombardo et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02422
Plaintiff:
David Lombardo and Michelle Lombardo
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Morton v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
Roy Morton
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Morton v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 5:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
Roy Morton
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
