Cases 1 - 10 of 3,021
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICES et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICES, PHILADELPHIA POLICES and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. SYMONETTE et al
as 2:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant:
ALLAN A. SYMONETTE, BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. BLAKNEY et al
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
BEN ROBERT STEWART
Defendant:
JAMES BLAKNEY, DORTHEA BARNS, IEASHA EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02116
Plaintiff:
ALVIA ZIA JONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHABAZZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
PIERRE THOMAS, KEVIN COACH K. LEE, KELAN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHABAZZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
PIERRE THOMAS, KEVIN COACH K LEE, KELAN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
