Cases 1 - 10 of 21
GREEN v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv02504
Defendant:
SHERIL HAMILTON, LUIS RODRIGUEZ, SHERAL HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
RASHON GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
RODRIGUEZ v. SOLOMAN
as 5:2022cv02647
Petitioner:
SANTOS LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SOLOMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2019cv00360
Defendant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, VLADIMIR MECHKOVA and others
Plaintiff:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02978
Plaintiff:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SPICER , NORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2017cv02160
Petitioner:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEWALD et al v. HILLER et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. DEWALD, II, KRIS PYLANT, DAMIEN CAMMILE and others
Defendant:
MARK HILLER, DAVID BYRNE and COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2016cv06505
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON, GENE BERDANIER, KRISTEN GRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv04732
Plaintiff:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
