Cases 1 - 10 of 25,625
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KHARCHENKO v. WT RAND TRANSPORT, LLC
as 2:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA KHARCHENKO
Defendant:
WT RAND TRANSPORT, LLC and WT RAND LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
RAND et al v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02883
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RACHELLE RAND and ANDREW RAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEISURE II v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2021cv01769
Defendant:
JACQUELINE PFURSICH and DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS DEBRA RAND
Plaintiff:
JUNIUS P. LEISURE II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALISBURY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04701
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
RAND SALISBURY and LINDA SALISBURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIMES v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00665
Defendant:
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, VIKING PUMP, INC., ABB, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RUTH F. HIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROGERS v. A. O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv05666
Defendant:
CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, TEXTRON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROGERS v. A.O. SMITH CORP et al
as 2:2019cv05544
Defendant:
TEXTRON, SELBY BATTERSBY AND COMPANY, GOODYEAR CANADA and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
