Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACK v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv04386
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACK
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY and OFFICER SMYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASSY v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2016cv04585
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASSY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY and ROBERT SMYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAYLISS v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY , DARBY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT , ROBERT SMYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALLEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv03111
Plaintiff:
PERCY ALLEN
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, JOSEPH A. SMYTH, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS CHIEF LAW INFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SESAY et al v. DARBY BOROUGH et al
as 2:2014cv05822
Plaintiff:
FATMATA SESAY and LUCY MORIBA-BROOKS
Defendant:
DARBY BOROUGH , ROBERT NEIL BARBOUR , DARRELL GUY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYATT v. KILROY et al
as 2:2014cv02867
Plaintiff:
TARIQ WYATT
Defendant:
JOHN KILROY, JULIE SMYTHE and MUNICIPALITY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
