Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff: Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant: Marc S. Howell, Stephen Marte, Even McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Plaintiff: Shaun Austin
Defendant: SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff and Former Superintendent Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Adragna et al v. Schmidt Baking Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: Salvatore Adragna, Daniel Austin, Bradley Johnson and others
Defendant: Schmidt Baking Company, Inc. and Schmidt Baking Distribution, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Haitos v. Hainsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner: Austin Patrick Haitos
Respondent: Melissa Hainsworth and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02119
Plaintiff: Austin Hall
Defendant: David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01837
Plaintiff: Jalil S. Reed
Defendant: Smith, Austin, Joseph Terra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01461
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Carr v. USA
as 1:2023cv01435
Petitioner: Austin Carr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carr v. USA
as 1:2023cv01436
Petitioner: Austin Carr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Austin v. DOC Disability Accommodation Board
as 4:2023cv00361
Plaintiff: Shaun Austin
Defendant: DOC Disability Accommodation Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?