Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Laster v. Barraza et al
as 4:2023cv00934
Petitioner:
Shermaine Laster
Respondent:
Warden Barraza, Veronica Hodge and Designation and Sentence Computation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Polk et al v. McDanial et al
as 1:2021cv01286
Plaintiff:
Rossie C. Polk and Lawrence Dixon
Defendant:
Warden John McDanial, Security Guard Husbrand, Hodge Unit Prison Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. McDanial et al
as 1:2021cv00935
Amicus Curiae:
Hodge Prison Administration Supervisor
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Dixon
Defendant:
Ms. Karen Pyle, Ms. Auderey A. England, Dr. Saraha Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19
as 3:2020cv00383
Plaintiff:
Karen Headley Hodge
Defendant:
Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodge v. Doe (1) et al
as 3:2019cv01573
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (6), Jane Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Rufus et al
as 3:2018cv01528
Defendant:
Child Youth Service, Freddie Rufus, Scranton Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Liggett Hodges v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01503
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Liggett Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hodges v. Child Youth Family Service Luzerne et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Defendant:
Child Youth Family Service Luzerne, Aaron McCurdy and Freddie Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Youth Family Service
as 3:2017cv01940
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Defendant:
Youth Family Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Ebbert
as 3:2016cv00259
Petitioner:
Jimmy Presley Hodge
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
