Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01917
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Townsend v. Rickard
as 1:2023cv01887
Petitioner:
Ricardo Townsend
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Johnson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections doing business as SCI-Dallas, Kevin Ranson, Jason Bohinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01125
Petitioner:
Ricardo Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Tauron Henderson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Kevin J. Ranson, Jasen Bohinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Acme Markets, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Torres
Defendant:
Acme Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Parker v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
Ricardo Kevin Parker
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant:
c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
