Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ROBERTS v. MALONE et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DAVID ROBERTS, SR.
Defendant:
IAN MALONE, OFFICER WAGNER FARRELL and OFFICER MASSEY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
OCCUPANCY MANAGER LAVERNE WAGNER, OPPUPANCY SPECIALIST JONATHAN MURPHY, NINA BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
HOGAN et al v. TOTH et al
as 2:2019cv01016
Defendant:
AGENT TOTH, OFFICER FARRELL WAGNER, BRENTWOOD POLICE DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
OCEANA ORTH, CALEB NIGRELLI and KRISTEN HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WAGNER v. BRENTWOOD BOROUGH et al
as 2:2019cv00971
Defendant:
CHIEF ADAM R. ZEPPUHAR and BRENTWOOD BOROUGH
Plaintiff:
FARRELL WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIEHL v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SIEHL
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN , CAMBRIA COUNTY, DAVID TULOWITZKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMINGTON v. CALLAHAN et al
as 3:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SIMINGTON
Defendant:
KELLY CALLAHAN, REGGIE FLOYD, GERALD LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PULLIAM v. WAGNER
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
LATASHA PULLIAM
Defendant:
SHAWN C. WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STUM v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE STUM
Defendant:
BRIAN THOMPSON and MICHELLE WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WAGNER v. CRAWFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAGNER
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY, CRAWFORD COUNTY BOARD OF JAIL INSPECTIONS, FRANCIS J. SCHULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRACKEN et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BRACKEN , WILLIAM DEFORTE , WILLIAM JACKSON and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, CHELSA WAGNER, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
