Cases 11 - 20 of 33
SEVERINO v. S.C.I. SOMERSET of PA DOC et al
as 3:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SEVERINO
Defendant:
S.C.I. SOMERSET of PA DOC and BCI- PREA COORDINATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
ISAAC BILAL PEARSON and ISSAC BILAL PEARSON
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC W. TICE, Sergeant WOZNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MURRAY v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv00152
Defendant:
FNU STRICKLAND, OTHER DOC EMPLOYEES WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE CURRENTLY NOT KNOWN, FNU WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL OVERMYER, PA. DOC. DEREK F. OBERLANDER, UNIT SGT. MAHONEY and others
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES S. DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KELLY v. PA DOC et al
as 3:2020cv00143
Defendant:
MS. QUINN, UNIT MANAGER CONNOR COUNCIL, MR. SHELBY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHEED KELLY and HAKEEM HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BEASON v. SCI ALBION DOC et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BEASON
Defendant:
SCI ALBION DOC and WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WOLF et al
as 3:2020cv00078
Defendant:
PA DOC, SCI HOUTZDALE and TOM WOLF
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCICCHITANO v. DOC SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2020cv00006
Defendant:
DOC SCI ALBION, CHRISTOPHER MEURE and SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL CLARK
Plaintiff:
ANTHONEY J. SCICCHITANO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
