Cases 1 - 10 of 30
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, MR. MATIYASIC, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
RASHAD M. WILLIAMS and MELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL R. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNA v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. MANNA
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ORLANDO HARPER, M.D. DONALD STECHSCHULTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-HOBSON v. KING
as 2:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
JORDAN SMITH-HOBSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KING v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING and SHAWN EVERETT KING
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00175
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and CRAIG PETTULLA
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO BAEZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BYUNGHAK JIN , MIN HI PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
