Cases 31 - 40 of 127
JONES v. COPELIC et al
as 3:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES and ROBERT MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, C/O BENDICK, C/O MCGOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WELLPATH COMMERCIAL et al
as 2:2021cv00377
Defendant:
DR. BYUNGHAK JIN, WELLPATH COMMERCIAL, JOHN DOES, 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROSARIO v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2021cv00208
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMISSIONER, DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROSARIO v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA et al
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMISSIONER, DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. CAPOZZA, et al
as 2:2021cv00133
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
RONELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MANUEL v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv01759
Defendant:
ASST SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, C/O SERGENT WILES, C/O LT. DAILEY and others
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. DEMASKE et al
as 2:2020cv01226
Defendant:
RICHARDS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GRIM, LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. NOWKOWSKI et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
NOWKOWSKI, HEAD and JOHN DOE 1
Plaintiff:
LA-QUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WALSH v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
KEVIN COWAN, JOHN DOES #1-20, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB DANIEL WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
