Cases 11 - 20 of 35
NESTOR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00807
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, INC., ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL OVERSIGHT BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LEE NESTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. IRWIN et al.
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MOSLEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY E. MONGELLUZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CAESAR v. KEMP et al
as 1:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
LAMONT CAESAR
Defendant:
SARGEANT KEMP, SUPERINTENDANT OBERLANDER, DEP SUPERINTENDENT MONGELLUZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. WOOTEN et al
as 2:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
SHARON K. POWELL
Defendant:
RYAN WOOTEN, STACEY VERSAW, ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
NAYLOR v. KEMP
as 2:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
TROY ANTHONY NAYLOR, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM KEMP, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODENOUGH et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
MARK GOODENOUGH, ROY HARDCASTLE, PHILIP ROACHE and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEMP v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KEMP
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KEMP v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KEMP
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KEMP v. WALLACE 2ND SHIFT
as 1:2019cv00304
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL KEMP
Defendant:
WALLACE 2ND SHIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. BRADLEY
as 3:2018cv00223
Petitioner:
KEMP EARL MITCHELL
Respondent:
ERIC BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
