Cases 11 - 20 of 61
ELLIS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00369
Petitioner:
LAFON ELLIS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ADAM SMITH and RICH FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KARPINSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS et al
as 3:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAMES KARPINSKI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS, WELLPATH, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNY v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
ELLIS MANNY and MANNY ELLIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PALMER et al v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv02029
Plaintiff:
ELLIE PALMER and MARC ROMEO
Defendant:
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HICKOX v. TICE et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Defendant:
ZACHARY MOSLAK, MELANIE PYLE, ERIC TICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HICKOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
