Cases 11 - 20 of 69
GRAHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
DAVID RICHARD GRAHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
GRAHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv01334
Plaintiff:
VALERIE SUE GRAHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
as 2:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv00590
Respondent:
JAIMIE SORBER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and EUGENE A. VITTONE, II
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. FREELAND
as 2:2021cv00549
Defendant:
LANAISHA FREELAND
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2021cv00449
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PATRICK HOMER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. ESPEL et al
as 2:2021cv00536
Defendant:
ESPEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Defendant:
COUNSELOR BEERS, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM and KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00132
Respondent:
SECRETRAY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ryan Graham
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
JANE DOE, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
