Cases 11 - 20 of 41
TCHIRKOW v. POWANDA et al
as 2:2019cv00984
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEMATT, JOSH SHAPIRO, ALLEN POWANDA and others
Plaintiff:
GREGG TCHIRKOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TORGERSEN v. KEATING et al
as 2:2019cv00410
Defendant:
VINAY KUMAR, EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP., PETER M. WILVER and others
Plaintiff:
DALLAS TORGERSEN
TCHIRKOW v. WALTON et al
as 2:2018cv00560
Petitioner:
GREGG ANDREW TCHIRKOW
Respondent:
JOHN WALTON, JOSH SHAPIRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRAND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. et al v. IREX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017mc01057
Plaintiff:
BRAND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. , BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC , BRAND SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant:
IREX CORPORATION, VERTICAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LLC, PRIME INDUSTRIAL ACCESS, LLC and others
Movant:
JOSEPH D'ULISSE
VELLO v. RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 3:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
MELISSA VELLO
Defendant:
RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT, RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ARNOLD NADONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TCHIRKOW v. WALTON et al
as 2:2017cv01269
Plaintiff:
GREGG ANDREW TCHIRKOW
Defendant:
JOHN WALTON and THOMAS FRADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
GREGG LANE SNYDER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHALUS v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv01242
Plaintiff:
MARGARET CHALUS
Defendant:
PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. and GREGG L. MORRIS, ESQUIRE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
RONALD A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
RONALD JOHNSON, KAREN JOHNSON, JOSEPH NIXSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
