Cases 11 - 20 of 33
JONES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 2:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
MARYLENE JONES
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and JERE R. JAMESON, III
Cause Of Action: Actions affecting property on which United States had lien
MARCLAY EMS, INC. et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES
as 2:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
MARCLAY EMS, INC. and MARCLAY COMMUNITY AMBULANCE, INC.
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00154
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PLATTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. PLATTS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532
LEROY v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2014cv01042
Plaintiff:
GUY LEROY
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014mc00098
Petitioner:
IVAN RIVAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and HOLLY NICHOLSON
PEOPLES v. PAMS et al
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
ODELL PEOPLES, JR.
Defendant:
PAMS, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, HONORABLE RICHARD G. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00033
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv01615
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, BEN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENZIE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2012cv01336
Plaintiff:
TREVOR G. MCKENZIE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
