Cases 11 - 20 of 50
LOPEZ MARTINEZ v. LECHLEITNER et al
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
JUAN MIGUEL LOPEZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PATRICK "P.J." LECHLEITNER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BOUIDIA v. GARLAND
as 3:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
MOHAMED BOUIDIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JEFFREY SEARLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FONTANA v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL S. FONTANA
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and STEVEN DETTELBACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NYAMEKYE v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL M. NYAMEKYE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
