Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
THOMAS v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff: ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant: COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, COLEMAN MCDONOUGH, SCOTT SCHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01756
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00375
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GAUS et al v. THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00471
Plaintiff: FRANK GAUS, III and KRISTI GAUS
Defendant: THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VERTEX NON-PROFIT HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
RAY v. ROGERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff: FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant: JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONOUGH v. UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE
as 2:2011cv01204
Plaintiff: SYLVIA MCDONOUGH
Defendant: UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00738
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCDONOUGH et al v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00939
Plaintiff: DONALD W. MCDONOUGH and CHARLOTTE H. MCDONOUGH
Defendant: BORG WARNER CORPORATION, BRIGGS-STRATTON CORP., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?