Cases 21 - 30 of 61
KAPP v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01380
Plaintiff:
KAREN KAPP
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ERIC BUSH, ROBERT MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2016cv00926
Plaintiff:
ANTWAUN BUSH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, NATHAN HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. BUSH et al
as 2:2016cv00744
Petitioner:
RAYMONT WALKER
Respondent:
ERIC A. BUSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WINN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN E. WETZEL, CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALYER v. HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 3:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
KYLE ALLEN SALYER
Defendant:
HOLLIDAYSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT , WAYNE BUSH , MARK R. HARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVID v. BUSH et al
as 2:2016cv00062
Petitioner:
ELBERT TYRONE DAVID
Respondent:
ERIC BUSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BUSH v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00718
Plaintiff:
RENEE DENISE BUSH
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCMULLEN v. BUSH et al
as 2:2015cv00686
Petitioner:
ERIC MCMULLEN
Respondent:
ERIC BUSH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUSH v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Petitioner:
LEONARD DWON BUSH
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
