Cases 21 - 30 of 54
WINCHESTER et al v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2021cv00139
Defendant:
COUNSELOR/TREATMENT JENN MONZA, DEPUTY WARDEN ETHEL WHITE, WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CANSLER, AIDAN HOMER, PATRICK HAYNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DOE v. CO SUPT., et al.
as 2:2020cv01761
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER, LT., PRT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN "G" DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WELTY v. KULT, et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Defendant:
KULT, CHUCKY, UNIT MANAGER MISS TINA M. RENNER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. HAILEY
Defendant:
COUNSELOR MARSHALL, JOHN WETZEL, OFFICER HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VICTOR v. FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COUNSELOR LOU, COMMISSIONER LOHR and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DENNIS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MAJOR J.R. BARROWS, SERGEANT NYMAN, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREACHER v. CORRECT CARE SERVICES
as 2:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES, DR. KROSS, COUNSELOR MICHAEL STELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
