Cases 21 - 30 of 47
KAJMOWICZ v. WHITAKER et al
as 2:2019cv00187
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT KAJMOWICZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 66, AFL-CIO AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COMBINED FUNDS, INC. v. UTTER CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01597
Defendant:
TERRY D. UTTER, JR., TRAVIS W. GARRETT, DWAYNE K. UTTER and others
Plaintiff:
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 66, AFL-CIO AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COMBINED FUNDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WALDSCHMIDT et al v. NVR, INC.
as 2:2018cv01372
Defendant:
NVR, INC.
Plaintiff:
MACKENSIE WALDSCHMIDT and GARRETT WALDSCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FREEMAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01506
Plaintiff:
GARRETT FREEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , ERIC BUSH , STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PINE GROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2017cv00021
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GREGORY GARRETT BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROOKS v. ELIZABETH BOROUGH et al
as 2:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BROOKS
Defendant:
ELIZABETH BOROUGH, GARRETT K. KIMMELL and DAN VERNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GARRETT BROWN
Defendant:
CLARK, MELINDA ADAMS, CARL H. FRANZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMBERT et al v. GRISBY et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY R. JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPLAN v. PREMIUM RECEIVABLES LLC
as 2:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
GARRETT CAPLAN
Defendant:
PREMIUM RECEIVABLES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
