Cases 21 - 30 of 48
GONZALEZ-LORA v. WINGEN
as 3:2015cv00161
Petitioner:
WILFREDO GONZALEZ-LORA
Respondent:
C. G. WINGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ v. COLEMAN
as 2:2015cv00336
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN
Petitioner:
CARMELO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONZALEZ v. COLEMAN
as 2:2015cv00252
Petitioner:
MANUEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GONZALEZ-LORA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE
as 3:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO GONZALEZ-LORA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. OWENS CORNING et al
as 2:2013cv01378
Plaintiff:
JAIME GONZALEZ
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING and OWENS CORNING SALES LLC
Plaintiff_consolidated:
PATRICIA WRIGHT , KEVIN WEST and GERALD BOEHM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2012cv00309
Plaintiff:
ANGEL GONZALEZ
Defendant:
HARLOW and D.O.C. CERT TEAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CHERYL GILL and MICHAEL W. HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIDDEN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. GONZALEZ
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
HIDDEN RIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
LILLIAN MARI GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
APONTE et al v. MARTINO et al
as 2:2011cv01335
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR OCAMPO APONTE , FRANCISCO JOSE BARBA AGUILERA , OSCAR IVAN OCAMPO APONTE and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH MARTINO, FRAZER DOES 1 AND 2, J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BENNETT v. BEGGS AND LANE, LLP et al
as 2:2011cv01222
Plaintiff:
SUSAN A. BENNETT
Defendant:
BEGGS AND LANE, LLP and THOMAS F. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
