Cases 21 - 30 of 38
MIKLE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
PHILLIP MICKLE, SR. and PHILLIP MIKLE, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2022cv00271
Petitioner:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Respondent:
CYNTHIA HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BENOIT v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2022cv00267
Petitioner:
RYAN A. BENOIT
Respondent:
CYNTHIA HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MIKLE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
PHILLIP A. MIKLE, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SCHMUTTE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
SHANE M. SCHMUTTE
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KARPINSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS et al
as 3:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAMES KARPINSKI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS, WELLPATH, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUTCHINSON v. WAYNE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv00745
Defendant:
MATTHEW VANASCO, WAYNE TOWNSHIP, SHARI BANEY and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINSON v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv00337
Plaintiff:
ERIK J. HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
