Cases 21 - 30 of 33
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 2:2012cv00477
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPOLYMENT COMPENSATION FUND and MARK D. FABIAN
Cause Of Action: Actions affecting property on which United States had lien
STULER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
LARRY L. STULER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BRYAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
LINDA J. BRYAN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
STULER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2010cv01342
Plaintiff:
LARRY L. STULER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00103
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
NICHOLAS v. EVANS et al
as 1:2008cv00350
Defendant:
SCOTT ARTHUR EVANS, DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES NICHOLAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KMG PROPERTIES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2008cv01544
Plaintiff:
KMG PROPERTIES
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TUKA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008mc00206
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. TUKA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and MATTHEW P. DAVEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00836
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00068
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
