Cases 21 - 30 of 43
SANTORE et al v. BAYER U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00671
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SANTORE , KELLY HAMILTON , ROSALIS ROMERO and others
Defendant:
BAYER U.S. LLC , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALTON v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
LUKE WALTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, CHRISTOPHER AVETTA and SHELLEY ROHRER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIELLO v. RILEY et al
as 2:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
VINCENT FAIELLO and MICHELLE FAIELLO
Defendant:
LUKE RILEY , EDWARD SLATER , LIBERTY BOROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SULLIVAN v. ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
LUKE J. SULLIVAN, III
Defendant:
ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SULLIVAN v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
LUKE J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., LVNV FUNDING, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2014cv00219
Petitioner:
DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. REGAN et al
as 2:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant:
DANIEL D. REGAN, NATHAN HARPER, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
