Cases 31 - 40 of 69
BARNETT v. PENN HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2016cv00274
Plaintiff:
DAVAUN BARNETT
Defendant:
PENN HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT , PENN HILLS SHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD , CARL BARBARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAHAM et al v. BOROUGH OF LIGONIER et al
as 2:2015cv01130
Plaintiff:
TODD GRAHAM and SPENCER KOZAR
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LIGONIER , JOHN BERGER , GREGORY SULLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKTON et al v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY, INC et al
as 2:2009mc00210
Defendant:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA, LLC, ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS C. HICKTON, ELSA DEPINA, JEFFREY GALIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRAHAM v. WARDEN
as 3:2014cv00196
Petitioner:
VINCENT K. GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALLHOUSE et al v. GORELL et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
CINDY A. ALLHOUSE , TAMMY S. ARBLE , JAMES M. BLAIR and others
Defendant:
WAYNE GORELL and BRIAN ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REAVES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv01773
Plaintiff:
REGINALD REAVES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
