Cases 31 - 40 of 66
HENDERSON v. POLLARD
as 2:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
TONY HENDERSON
Defendant:
APRIL POLLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv00839
Petitioner:
AARON HENDERSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENDERSON v. BICKEL et al
as 1:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
WARREN HENDERSON
Defendant:
JOANNE BICKEL, LINDA TROUT, SCOTT BRECHENRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIXON v. TORMA et al
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
JIMITA RACHEL DIXON
Defendant:
TORMA, GAGE, EARTHLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2016cv00926
Plaintiff:
ANTWAUN BUSH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, NATHAN HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EQUITRANS, L.P. v. AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPLELINE ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG AND INDIANA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00570
Plaintiff:
EQUITRANS, L.P.
Defendant:
AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPLELINE ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG AND INDIANA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA, ERNEST ANDERSON, EDWARD DUNMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
HENDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF S.S.I.
as 2:2015cv01199
Plaintiff:
KENNESHA HENDERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF S.S.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HINKLEDIRE v. PREBISH et al
as 3:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY S. HINKLEDIRE
Defendant:
JOHN J. PREBISH, CHRISTIAN SMITH, WILLIAM PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
