Cases 31 - 40 of 51
PEW v. EXTRACTION TEAM MEMBERS et al
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
EXTRACTION TEAM MEMBERS, JOHN DOE 2-10, VILARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAN v. IMPERIAL BUFFET INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
GEN WANG HAN
Defendant:
IMPERIAL BUFFET INC., DUKE CHEN, "JOHN DOE" 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PETERSON v. OPRENDEK et al
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. PETERSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY C. OPRENDEK, BENJAMIN E. ZIMMER, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMELIO v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. et al
as 2:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO AMELIO
Defendant:
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. , MARC S. WEISBERG , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WALKER v. DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
MONTAGUE WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, MANKE, MCWILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SLADE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00895
Plaintiff:
DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
SLADE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, MICHAEL SLADE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MORENO et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00615
Plaintiff:
GEORGEIA MORENO , DARLENE STAYMATES and MARK STAYMATES
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CHIEF OF POLICE NATHAN HARPER, OFFICER MICHAEL REDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
