Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BALL v. 890 WEATHERWOOD LANE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
DORIS ANN BALL
Defendant:
890 WEATHERWOOD LANE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC and THE REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWEN v. PENNSYLVANIA SOLDIERS' AND SAILORS' HOME (PSSH) et al
as 1:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
NANCY E. LEWEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SOLDIERS' AND SAILORS' HOME (PSSH) , BARBARA RAYMOND , PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS (DMVA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNYDER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
GREGG LANE SNYDER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MAYER v. LANE et al
as 2:2017cv00586
Petitioner:
JACK MAYER
Respondent:
JAY LANE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENDER v. BERRIER et al
as 2:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BENDER
Defendant:
SUSAN BERRIER, MELINIE NAGGY, MULROY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MAYO v. OPPMAN et al
as 2:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAYO
Defendant:
MICHAEL OPPMAN, DARLA COWDEN and JAY LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OTERO v. LANE et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Petitioner:
RICHARD DANIEL OTERO
Respondent:
JAY LANE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
