Cases 31 - 40 of 55
SULLIVAN v. ARCONIC INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
JANET L. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ARCONIC INC., KLAUS KLEINFELD, ROBERT S. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
SULLIVAN v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2016cv01775
Petitioner:
DAVID STEPHEN SULLIVAN
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2016cv01576
Plaintiff:
AIDAN HOWARD
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, TERESA A. SULLIVAN, CRAIG LITTLEPAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELTZ et al v. ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv00179
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA R. BELTZ , JOSEPH S. SULLIVAN and ANITA SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY , KAJ AHLMANN, JOHN T. BAILY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIXON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
JIMITA RACHEL DIXON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TORMA, M. SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
LUKE J. SULLIVAN, III
Defendant:
ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SULLIVAN v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
LUKE J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., LVNV FUNDING, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PISCIOTTA v. SZELEWSKI et al
as 1:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
GIACOMO PISCIOTTA
Defendant:
SZELEWSKI, GILBERT, SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. STATE FARM et al
as 2:2013cv01152
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
STATE FARM, NIKOLE SULLIVAN, DAVE LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
