Cases 51 - 60 of 73
PEREZ v. KIERTAN INC.
as 2:2014cv00649
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
KIERTAN INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DIAZ-PEREZ v. GUAJAN
as 2:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
DANIELA DIAZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
GLADYS GUAJAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. KEPHART et al
as 3:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
DAVID KEPHART, TIMOTHY KEPHART, KEPHART TRUCKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ZUBIK et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 2:2013cv01459
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. ZUBIK , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH and CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , THOMAS PEREZ , JACOB J. LEW and others
Movant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PERSICO et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE T. PERSICO , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE , ST. MARTIN CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , THOMAS PEREZ , JACOB J. LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
PEREZ v. DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC et al
as 2:2013cv01118
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC. and GEORGE M. DAVISON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CONCEPCION v. WIGEN
as 3:2013cv00112
Petitioner:
RAFAEL PEREZ CONCEPCION
Respondent:
G. C. WIGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PEREZ-RIVERA v. EMERGENCY RESTRAINT CHAIR, INC.
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
BRYAN A. PEREZ-RIVERA
Defendant:
EMERGENCY RESTRAINT CHAIR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
