Cases 51 - 60 of 82
HUGHES v. TALEGA et al
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HUGHES
Defendant:
TALEGA, MAXINE OVERTON, MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CORPORATE GLASS, INC., v. HUGHES-ROLLER BUILDING CO.
as 1:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
CORPORATE GLASS, INC.,
Defendant:
HUGHES-ROLLER BUILDING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2011cv00206
Defendant:
TERRY A. HUGHES, ERIN D. HUGHES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
TRIAD FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC v. RURAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC et al
as 2:2011cv01158
Plaintiff:
TRIAD FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC
Defendant:
RURAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC, WILLIAM L. HUGHES, LUCINDA C. HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNEAULT et al v. O'TOOLE et al
as 1:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
EDSON R. ARNEAULT and GREGORY J. RUBINO
Defendant:
KEVIN F. O'TOOLE , R. DOUGLAS SHERMAN , E. BARRY CREANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE L. HUGHES
Defendant:
HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. and WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BERAN et al v. NORTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BERAN , MELANIE BERAN and JENNIFER BERAN
Defendant:
NORTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT , PAUL HUGHES , REGIS WELSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUGHES v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv01300
Plaintiff:
LEWIS HUGHES
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HUGHES v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2010cv00203
Petitioner:
ROBERT HUGHES
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA, ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
