Cases 61 - 70 of 178
HUMPHREYS v. FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01059
Plaintiff:
SHANE HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE RESTAURANTS, INC. v. OLANDER et al
as 2:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE RESTAURANTS, INC.
Defendant:
H. WARD OLANDER , SHIRLEY M. OLANDER , KAI OLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LABMD, INC. v. TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. et al
as 2:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
LABMD, INC.
Defendant:
TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. , ROBERT J. BOBACK , M. ERIC JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
MONTAGUE WALKER
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MARY BOBECK, R.N., PAUL DASCANI, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. OPRENDEK et al
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. PETERSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY C. OPRENDEK, BENJAMIN E. ZIMMER, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMELIO v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. et al
as 2:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO AMELIO
Defendant:
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. , MARC S. WEISBERG , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WALKER v. DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
MONTAGUE WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, MANKE, MCWILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
