Cases 61 - 70 of 403
GIBBONS v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BARRY GIBBONS
Defendant:
BICKELL, RICH KUSTENBAUDER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DRAZDIK v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE
as 2:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STEPHEN DRAZDIK, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OKORIE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01107
Petitioner:
SAMUEL OKORIE
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STEPHEN ZAPALA and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OSGOOD et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. OSGOOD and WANDA OSGOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
JONES et al v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR., ANTHONY LEE, CHARLES LANTZY and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Petitioner:
CODY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC. v. DCK NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01002
Defendant:
DCK NORTH AMERICA, LLC, DCK WORLDWIDE, LLC, STEPHEN D'ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DERK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00657
Defendant:
COUNSELOR PALMER, SECURITY LT. HINCHCLIFF, CO.1 D.N. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. DERK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ABDUL-WAALEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00638
Defendant:
STEPHEN R. KAUFMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MERRICK GARLAND
Plaintiff:
LUTFEE ABDUL-WAALEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
