Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 245
ADAMSON et al v. KIRKHAM SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00778
Defendant: COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and KIRKHAM SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff: DUSTIN ADAMSON and DAVID WHITE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00710
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00274
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00276
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITE v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00028
Plaintiff: WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SAUNDERS v. RALEIGH COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant: CHARLES R. HUMPHREY, THEE HONORABLE ADAM DIMLICH, CITY OF BECKLEY and others
Plaintiff: RAYCO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. T.D.C.J. et al
as 3:2019cv00226
Plaintiff: PATRICK A. WHITE, SR.
Defendant: STATE OF TEXAS and T.D.C.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MUHAMMAD v. ERIE COUNTY CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY et al
as 3:2019cv00206
Defendant: DONALD DANCUS, STACEY TUPEK, MICHAEL J. CHODUBSKI and others
Plaintiff: FAYSAL SALIM MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WHITE v. WARDEN OF SCHUYLKILL
as 2:2019cv01158
Petitioner: TIMOTHY WHITE
Respondent: WARDEN OF SCHUYLKILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OSORIO v. TCV COMMUNITY SERVICES, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00660
Defendant: ASHLEY LEONARD BRINKMAN, CAPITAL HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC., TCV COMMUNITY SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: MIRIAM OSORIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?