Cases 1 - 10 of 43
CHATMAN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT CHATMAN, DAJUNT PORTER, LASHAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE NORMAN LOCKE, OFFICER KIRK KOTCHIG, DAVID REICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZADERNAK v. EAGAL et al
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
NANCY Y. ZADERNAK
Defendant:
LLOYD EAGAL and EAGAL EXCAVATING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
MIN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH Y. MIN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON, SUPERINTENDENT OF ACJ and MEDICAL DEPT. OF ACJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDLETON v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, DETECTIVE Y. OVERHOLT, JANET R. NECESSARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
AMATO et al v. AAA INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB et al
as 2:2020cv00684
Plaintiff:
GARY M. AMATO and QIN Y. AMATO
Defendant:
INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB, AAA INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB and AAA AUTO CLUB INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PODLUCKY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE et al
as 2:2020cv00343
Defendant:
TIMOTHY D. MARSH, JAMES Y. GARRETT, LISA GAPSKY and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILTON et al v. STAFFORD
as 2:2019cv01541
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE HILTON, MINERVA Y. HILTON, MICHAEL STEPHENS and others
Defendant:
JUDY G. STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00651
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH Y. WOOD
Defendant:
MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SPADA v. Y & Y HOLDINGS et al
as 1:2018cv00255
Defendant:
MAURICE DEUTSCH, TERRA GAINES, JOHN DRAYHEIM and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY THOMAS SPADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
