Cases 1 - 10 of 2,373
DAVIS-EL v. KELLY et al
as 2:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
CHRIS KELLY, BRIAN KAMAUF, KAREN SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. MARKS et al
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
ARIES SHAW
Defendant:
AARON M. MARKS, JOEY D BRANT, CORPORAL MARIACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BROWN v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN M. WASHINGTON, SOE VENELLI, CMC ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
LEVI GIDDINGS
Defendant:
M. J. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, MR. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
