Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MCCANN v. CHERNISKY et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CHERNISKY, WARDEN SMITH, CAPTAIN WOLFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2023cv01702
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY C. SMITH
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEACON SALES ACQUISITION INC. v. SRI ROOFING & SHEET METAL, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
BEACON SALES ACQUISITION INC. doing business as BEACON BUILDING PRODUCTS
Defendant:
SRI ROOFING & SHEET METAL, LLC doing business as SRI ROOFING AND SHEET METAL, ROBERT L. RAND, JR. and THOMAS C. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2020cv02025
Defendant:
DANIEL M. LINES, RACHEL L. RODDY, JACLYN SERSLAND and others
Plaintiff:
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. MEINERT
as 2:2017cv01485
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL E. MEINERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01817
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY C. SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and BRUCE BEEMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOCKETT v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv01636
Petitioner:
TRAMALE LOCKETT
Respondent:
RICHARD C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEE v. SCHRADER et al
as 2:2013cv01757
Plaintiff:
PRESTON LEE
Defendant:
SCHRADER and J. C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEARAM v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEARAM
Defendant:
GEORGE C. WIGEN, DR. CUTLER, J. HUBLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BERKLEY et al v. SAMSON RESOURCES COMPANY
as 3:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
LEWIS W. BERKLEY , BARBARA M. BERKLEY , DOUGLAS E. DIEHL and others
Defendant:
SAMSON RESOURCES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
