Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HUMPHRIES v. PITTSBURGH TECHNICAL COLLEGE
as 2:2022cv01306
Defendant:
KAYLA M HUMPHRIES and PITTSBURGH TECHNICAL COLLEGE
Plaintiff:
KAYLA M. HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HUMPHRIES v. EASTERN ALLIANCE INSURANCE GROUP
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
KAYLA M HUMPHRIES
Defendant:
EASTERN ALLIANCE INSURANCE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
PENDLETON et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
DREW PENDLETON, SYLVIA MCDANIEL, JIM WOLFF and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHRIES v. PLUM
as 2:2021cv00813
Defendant:
DONALD PLUM
Plaintiff:
BREONA HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUMPHRIES v. PLUM
as 1:2021cv00813
Defendant:
DONALD PLUM
Plaintiff:
BREONA HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACK et al v. YOUNGUE et al
as 2:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
DEBRA BLACK and EARL BLACK
Defendant:
EUGENE YOUNGUE and DAVID HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLECCKLEY et al v. CITY OF BEAVER FALLS et al
as 2:2012cv01835
Plaintiff:
SAUN CLECKLEY and VICTORIA CLECKLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF BEAVER FALLS, ROBERT E. APPLEGARTH, TRENT HUMPHRIES, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHRIES v. USA
as 2:2012cv01492
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOHN MICHAEL HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ATAIN INSURANCE COMPANY v. JONCO TRADING, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
ATAIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JONCO TRADING, INC. and JOHN HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HUMPHRIES v. HOUGHTON et al
as 2:2010cv01514
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HUMPHRIES
Defendant:
MARY M. HOUGHTON, MARIE VEON, KIMBERLY R. ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
