Cases 1 - 10 of 63
ARDAN GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC et al v. NOTARYCAM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
ARDAN GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC, INKED HOLDINGS, LLC, MORTGAGE CONNECT, L.P. and others
Defendant:
NOTARYCAM, INC. and HYE-JIN E. PORUPSKY
WILKINS v. HERBIK et al
as 2:2021cv00756
Defendant:
DR. LANASA, DR. JIN BYUNGHAK and MICHAEL JOSEPH HERBIK
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN WILKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WELLPATH COMMERCIAL et al
as 2:2021cv00377
Defendant:
DR. BYUNGHAK JIN, WELLPATH COMMERCIAL, JOHN DOES, 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. THE PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00794
Defendant:
MR. KNEPPER, THE PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, C.O. 1 BAGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARRIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00479
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, STEPHAN LONGSTRETH and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BEAU HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERKIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
DEPUTY ERIC AMEL, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EYAJAN v. NESCO RESOURCE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
BILL KAYDO, RANDY EDWARDS, COMMUNITY HEALTH NET and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARMON v. GIBBS et al
as 2:2017cv01653
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HARMON
Defendant:
DENNIS GIBBS, JEFFERY ROEHANNA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
