Cases 1 - 10 of 496
LEE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
ALAN VICTOR LEE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WEBB v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
DEREK LEE WEBB
Respondent:
JILL E. RANGOS, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOOZER v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
LEE BOOZER
Respondent:
MICHAEL GOURLEY and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAINES et al v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Haines and Neil Paul Haines
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Non-Motor Vehicle
HAYNES v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE HAYNES
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MILLIN et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ESQ. JEFFREY K. MILLIN, BRIAN K. DEAL, GEORGE A. DEAL, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
SHAW v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
GUTHRIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
LEE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TODD BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
