Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BALDWIN et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01923
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BALDWIN, JAMES CAHALAN, BRUCE GINSBURG and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILLIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILLIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FRIEM et al v. CANON-MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
RACHEL FRIEM and D CODY HICKTON
Defendant:
CANON-MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTMAN v. HENRY CLAY TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE HARTMAN, JR.
Defendant:
HENRY CLAY TOWNSHIP, CHARLES MYERS, WILLIAM HAYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. MAYOR SCHEMBER et al
as 1:2019cv00179
Defendant:
MAYOR SCHEMBER, ERIE POLICE TRAFFIC DIVISION CAPTAIN, OWNERS OF MCMILLAN TOWING and others
Plaintiff:
AMOS TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE THIRD WARD OF CANONSBURG BOROUGH
as 2:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
CANON-MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MCMILLAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv01460
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCMILLAN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KUBIAK v. CANON MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
CAYLA KUBIAK
Defendant:
CANON MCMILLAN SCHOOL DISTRICT , NICK BAYAT , STEVE MOSKAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, R. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMILLAN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv01355
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL MCMILLAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
